Notice: Undefined index: ee8036376106d3cb in /mnt/stor2-wc1-dfw1/395791/blog.builderscrap.com/web/content/wp-content/plugins/akismet/akismet.php on line 1
sustainable homesTag Archive for sustainable-homes archive at Recipro Blog - Recipro Blog
 

Latest News...Available Now

 

Posts Tagged ‘sustainable homes’

10 Tips for Complying with the Code for Sustainable Homes

Friday, August 14th, 2009

We have recently come across this interesting article which highlights ten tips for complying with the Code for Sustainable Homes.

Whilst much of the housing industry has become familiar with the Code for Sustainable Homes rating, the 300-page Technical Guide can still present a daunting prospect.
The Code Simply Explained, produced by experts from BRE and NHBC, has been produced as a handy guide to help developers, builders and contractors comply with the Code and achieve a good score in a practical and cost-effective manner.

In particular it focuses on Levels 3 and 4 as the most commonly specified at present, but with principles equally applicable to all levels of the Code.

Below are ten top tips from the NHBC Foundation for climbing up the Code rating system, adapted from The Code Simply Explained (full copy):

1. Start early
At a very early stage, before the site layout has been finalised, start to consider Code-related issues. Particularly mandatory requirements which must be implemented in full to achieve any Code level rating in many cases. But credits may be achieved more easily for issues such as energy, daylighting, and ecology amongst others if measures are integrated into the design now, for example by orientating roofs and living spaces to the south to make best use of solar energy. Seek advice from a qualified Code assessor to ensure that the criteria have been correctly understood.
2. Target easy-win credits
Several credits can be achieved through measures which are independent of the design and achievable in all developments. This includes simple measures such as energy-efficient light fittings and a drying line, and will be cost-effective to specify in most developments.
 3. Enhance ecology and reduce flood risk
By taking site factors such as flood risk and ecological values into account at an early stage, the baseline for the Code score can be assessed. Sites of high ecological value or with a risk of flooding are likely to increase the cost of achieving a high Code rating, so this needs to be considered. An ecological survey following Code guidelines will still be worthwhile to improve the score for most sites, both Greenfield and previously developed.
 4. Effective construction and supply chain management
Implementing measures relating to the construction stage such as monitoring of energy and water use and reducing pollution risk can be a cost-effective way to improve your score, but requires preparation in advance of starting on site so that procedures are in place and the workforce are aware of them. In particular, a Site Waste Management Plan is a mandatory requirement so must be given early consideration. Modern Methods of Construction using offsite construction can help make this process easier.
5. Reduce water consumption in the planning stages
Early attention to Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDs) can be cost-effective and potentially provide amenity value through the use of water features such as ponds.  The mandatory requirement to reduce runoff volumes, and not just peak run off rates, is an important one to get right, necessitating full consideration of infiltration and rainwater harvesting opportunities. Rainwater harvesting can contribute to reducing surface water runoff and reduce internal water use, but this needs very careful design to meet the requirements of both.
6. Plan the layout to give the space you need
Considering the site layout from an early stage gives the best opportunity to include space requirements for highly weighted Lifetime Homes credits, and a design that enables direct access to rear gardens means that garden sheds can be used for cycle storage. An option for a room-in-the-roof means that an extra credit can be gained to improve the score later on, if this proves to be the preferred strategy.
7. Consider the environmental impact of your materials
Looking at the proposed building materials early means that most types of constructions can perform well – there are many equivalent products with lower environmental impact but equally fit for purpose. There is a mandatory requirement for ratings against the Green Guide so a strategy to achieve that is vital.
8. Ensure your house is Secured By Design
Incorporate the recommendations of a police architectural liaison officer or crime prevention design officer to meet Part 2 of the Secured By Design award is a straightforward way to gain extra credits
9. Insulate to improve performance and reduce consumption
Designing the building fabric to achieve a good sound performance and air tightness and to avoid thermal bridges requires many of the same principles and can help achieve credits in several different areas. Building fabric with a high thermal performance will help to reduce carbon emissions and provide benefits to residents for the full lifetime of the building,
10. Employ strategies to enhance energy sources
Ensure a strategy is in place for low and zero carbon energy technologies, such as renewables and CHP. Most developments will need these technologies to meet Code Level 3 or higher, and the mandatory requirements for carbon dioxide emissions can be very expensive or impractical to achieve unless their integration is planned from the start.

BuilderScrap have recently begun workign with BRE to discuss how the two initiatives can benefit each other.  Watch this space for news!

Draft Strategy for Sustainable Construction Chapter 16

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

Time now for the next part of the Draft on sustainable construction brought to you by Builderscrap.com. Today we reflect on the previous posts and scrutinise the time frames given.

Q: Do the targets and milestones appear realistic, achievable and sufficiently ambitious over the time frames envisaged? If not, then please suggest alternatives, and who should be responsible for their implementation.

1. Around 75% of respondents who answered this question agreed that the proposed targets were realistic and achievable. A smaller proportion (15%) favoured more challenging targets.

2. The only comment on the first target (All new homes built with English Partnerships or Housing Corporation funding to meet Level 3 of the Code for Sustainable Homes (105 litres per person per day) from April 2008) was that there should be a link to the higher levels of the Code for Sustainable Homes.

3. A small number of respondents to the second target felt that the target level of litres per head/ per day set in the Building Regulations in 2008 should be 100 litres/head/day and not, as proposed, 125 litres/head/day.

4. Some respondents felt that the fourth target (reduction in water consumption by 25% on office and non-office estate by 2020 relative to 2004/05 levels) needed greater clarity.

Find it... Save the Environment

Hundreds of building products available today

© 2008 builderscrap.com - Unit 4 Hawkshead Road, Greenfields Technology Park, Bromborough, Wirral. CH62 3RJ TEL: 0844 225 3000